Four ways to get a ground surface. Each one is the right answer somewhere.
There are four common ways to get an elevation surface of a piece of ground: a licensed surveyor walking it with a rover or a total station, a manned aircraft flying LiDAR over a whole county, a drone flying a camera, and a drone flying a LiDAR sensor. Each is the right answer for some jobs and the wrong answer for others. We fly the last two, and we send people to the first one all the time.
This is the comparison we give clients on the phone, written down. Paragon Aerial Solutions has mapped 53,000-plus acres in the last 12 months, and a fair share of those were flown with a camera because that was the better tool. The pricing page covers what each costs relative to the others.
| Conventional ground survey | Manned aerial LiDAR | Drone photogrammetry | Drone LiDAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typical coverage per day | A few acres of dense topo, more on open ground | Tens of thousands of acres | A few hundred acres | A few hundred to over a thousand acres, depending on canopy |
| Ground under trees | Yes — every shot is on the dirt | Yes, at regional density | No — the surface is the top of the canopy | Yes, at project density |
| Point density | Sparse — a shot every so many feet, plus breaklines | Low — commonly around 2 points per square meter for public data | Very high on visible surfaces | Hundreds of points per square meter |
| Currency | Whenever the crew walks it | Whenever the block was flown — often years old | The day it is flown | The day it is flown |
| Typical use | Boundaries, plats, control, small-site topo, as-built certification | Statewide and county elevation, floodplain mapping, watershed studies | Open-site topo, stockpile volumes, construction progress, orthomosaics | Timbered tracts, corridors, levee and pond design, wooded drainage, mine sites |
| Who certifies | The licensed surveyor or engineer who did it | The contracting agency; not project-certified | Nobody, until a licensed surveyor or PE adopts it into their work | Same — the surveyor or PE designs from it and certifies their own work |
The rest of this page is what that table leaves out.
A licensed Professional Land Surveyor walking the site with GPS or a total station is the standard for a reason. Every point they shoot is on the ground, tied to monuments they found or set. Nothing we do replaces that for what it is for.
And there is a list of things only a surveyor can do, by law. Establishing property lines, setting corners, preparing plats, certifying easements, and sealing a survey of record are the practice of land surveying, licensed by the state. In Alabama that is the Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. Design documents get sealed by a licensed Professional Engineer.
Paragon is not a licensed surveying firm. We collect and process aerial data. Our deliverable — the point cloud, the bare-earth model, the contours, the volumes — is what a surveyor or engineer designs from, checks against, and certifies as part of their own work. If you need a boundary, a plat, or a sealed drawing, you need them, and nothing on this page changes that.
Where the ground crew struggles is density and terrain. Cross-sectioning a wooded bottom on foot is slow and expensive, and the surface between shots is interpolated. That is the job Alabama surveyors hand to us: they set the control, we fill in the ground between it with hundreds of points per square meter, and they use both.
A LiDAR sensor in a fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter covers ground faster than anything else on this list. It is how the USGS 3D Elevation Program and state agencies map entire counties, and it is why free LiDAR exists for most of the Southeast.
Specs and coverage: USGS 3D Elevation Program. Public collections are commonly at Quality Level 2, about 2 points per square meter.
Download it before you call anybody. It answers watershed questions, rough grade, and floodplain shape, and it is the right first look at any tract. What it does not do is come back when you need it: the collection date may be years old, the density is regional rather than design-scale, and it is not tied to your engineer's control. Hiring a manned flight for a single project makes sense on very large corridors and rarely otherwise.
A drone with a camera flies a grid of overlapping photos, and software matches features across them to build a 3D surface and an orthomosaic. On ground the camera can see — a graded pad, a stockpile yard, a pasture, a row-crop field, a fresh cutover — the result is dense, accurate with ground control, and cheaper to fly than LiDAR.
We fly a lot of it. Monthly stockpile volumes, construction progress, pond sites in open pasture, and Black Belt fields are photogrammetry jobs and we quote them that way.
Its limit is simple. The surface it builds is whatever the camera saw, and under trees the camera saw leaves. Photogrammetry produces a fine model of the canopy and nothing about the ground under it, and no processing setting fixes that. It also struggles on uniform surfaces — still water, featureless concrete — where there is nothing to match.
A LiDAR sensor on a drone fires laser pulses downward. Most hit vegetation. Some find gaps and return off the actual ground. Those ground returns are classified out, and a bare-earth surface is built from them. That is the whole trick, and it is why LiDAR is the tool for timbered tracts, wooded corridors, brushy cutovers, river bottoms, and any drainage question that runs through trees.
Compared with manned LiDAR, a drone flies lower and slower and puts hundreds of points per square meter on the ground rather than a couple. Compared with photogrammetry, it sees the dirt. Compared with a ground crew, it covers a wooded bottom in an afternoon instead of a week — but it does not set corners, and it does not seal anything.
We run an RTK base station on every LiDAR flight, set ground control and collect checkshots when the job needs a measured accuracy statement, and process everything in-house. The honest limits: closed-canopy evergreen and leaf-on hardwood so dense that almost nothing reaches the ground, and standing water, which absorbs the pulse. We will say so before we fly. The Alabama page goes into what the accuracy actually looks like under different cover.
Pick a licensed surveyor when the question is where the line is, who owns what, or you need a plat, a sealed drawing, or a survey of record. Also for small sites where a crew can walk it in a day and there is no canopy to fight.
Pick manned aerial LiDAR (usually the free public data) when the question is regional — watershed shape, floodplain extent, a first look at a large tract — and currency and density do not matter yet.
Pick drone photogrammetry when the ground is open and you need dense, current data at the lowest cost: stockpiles, pads, pastures, fields, construction sites, orthomosaic imagery.
Pick drone LiDAR when the ground is under trees or brush and you need a current, dense bare-earth surface tied to control: levee and pond design, wooded corridors, timber tracts, mine and reclamation ground, subdivisions going into cutover, and any drainage that runs through timber.
Pick two of them more often than you would think. The most common pairing we see is a surveyor setting control and boundary while we fly the topo between; the second is LiDAR for bare earth with photogrammetry on the same mission for the orthomosaic.
You will see aerial mapping companies describe their data with surveying language. We try not to. A drone LiDAR deliverable is aerial data at a stated, measured accuracy, and it becomes part of a survey or a design when a licensed professional adopts it into their work. That is how the system is supposed to work, and it is why engineers and surveyors in Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Tennessee, and Arkansas keep calling us back.
If you are not sure which method your project needs, send a boundary and a sentence on what the surface is for. Call or text (205) 394-6256. We will tell you — including when the answer is not us.
Tell us the site, the trees, and what the surface is for. We will say which method fits — including when it is not ours.